PL EN
Residence and use. Comments on the concept of infrastructure
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wydział Filologiczny UŁ, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2025-07-31
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-11-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-12-04
 
 
Publication date: 2026-04-15
 
 
Corresponding author
Zofia Hartman   

Wydział Filologiczny UŁ, Uniwersytet Łódzki, ul. Pomorska 171/173, 90-236, Łódź, Polska
 
 
KAiU 2025;LXX(4):19-41
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This article attempts to conceptualise the concept of infrastructure from a humanistic perspective, taking into account its origins, semantic evolution and contemporary theoretical approaches. The author departs from a technocratic understanding of infrastructure as a set of material facilities supporting the functioning of society to offer an analysis of this concept as relational, history-dependent and embedded in social practices. The text discusses key approaches developed in science and technology studies (STS), philosophy, sociology and urban studies, including work on infrastructure by S.L. Star, G.C. Bowker, B. Larkin, L. Winner and B. Latour. Particular attention was paid to the tension between the utilitarian function and the existential dimension of infrastructure, by analysing the opposition between ‘using’ and ‘inhabiting’ (based, among other things, on the reflections of M. Heidegger). The article emphasises that infrastructure does not exist as an objective set of elements, but as a dynamic relationship between the artefact and the socio-cultural context. The proposed perspective makes it possible to reinterpret the concept of infrastructure as a phenomenon that is not only technical but also deeply embedded in human experience and the structures of everyday life.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Arbiszewski, K., Teoria Aktora-Sieci Bruno Latoura, „Teksty Drugie”, 2007, nr 1–2.
 
2.
Assmann, A., Memory, Individual and Collective, w: The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, red. R. E. Goodin, C. Tilly, New York 2006.
 
3.
Bowker G.S., Star, S.L., Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA 2000.
 
4.
Deleuze G., Po czym rozpoznać strukturalizm?, tłum. S. Cichowicz, w: Drogi współczesnej filozofii, red. W. Siemek, Warszawa 1978.
 
5.
Easterling K., Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space, London, New York 2015.
 
6.
Harvey D., Social Justice and the City, Athens, GA 1973.
 
7.
Infrastructuring Publics, red. M. Korn, W. Reißmann, T. Röhl, D. Sittler, Berlin 2019.
 
8.
Kuhn T., Struktura rewolucji naukowych, tłum. H. Ostromęcka, Warszawa 2020.
 
9.
Larkin B., The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure, „Annual Review of Anthropology”, T. 42, 2013.
 
10.
Latour B., Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA 1999.
 
11.
Littré, E., Dictionnaire de la langue française, Paris 1863–1873, https://www.littre.org/definit....
 
12.
Niewöhner J., Infrastructures of Society, Anthropology of, w: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, red. J.D. Wright, Amsterdam 2015, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.12201-9.
 
13.
Rankin K., Infrastructure and the international governance of economic development 1950–1965, w: Internationalization of Infrastructures: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on the Economics of Infrastructures, red. W. Auger, J.F. Bouma, J. Kunneke, Delft 2009.
 
14.
Ruhleder K., Star, S.L., Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces, „Information Systems Research”, 1996, nr 7(1), DOI: 10.1287/isre.7.1.111.
 
15.
Star S. L., The Ethnography of Infrastructure, „American Behavioral Scientist”, T. 43, 1999, nr 3.
 
16.
Turner C., The Infrastructured State. Territoriality and the National Infrastructure System, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, 2020.
 
17.
Volmar A., From Systems to ‘Infrastructuring’: Infrastructure Theory and Its Impact on Writing the History of Media, w: Rethinking Infrastructure Across the Humanities, Bielefeld 2023.
 
18.
White R., Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America, New York 2011.
 
19.
Winner L., Do Artifacts Have Politics?, „Daedalus”, 1980, T. 109 nr 1: Modern Technology: Problem or Opportunity?.
 
eISSN:2657-6864
ISSN:0023-5865
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top