PL EN
Bio-Innovation as a Source of Inspiration for Contemporary Architecture
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wydział Architektury/ Zakład Projektowania i Teorii Architektury, Politechnika Warszawska, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2025-06-26
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-09-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-09-26
 
 
Publication date: 2026-03-17
 
 
Corresponding author
Ewa Kuhnert   

Wydział Architektury/ Zakład Projektowania i Teorii Architektury, Politechnika Warszawska, Koszykowa 55, 00-659, Warszawa, Polska
 
 
KAiU 2025;LXX(2):90-114
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
For many years, solutions drawn from nature have been applied in various fields of science, and today knowledge of biology is also a source of inspiration for creative work. In the field of architecture, processes observed in nature are transferred to design, offering new perspectives and tools, and influencing work methods. Biological sciences permeate the design field under ‘bio’ terms such as biomimetics, biomimicry, bionics, biophilia and biomorphism, which together represent the broader issue of bio-innovation. Although there are precise defi nitions and classifi cations of these ‘bio’ concepts in the technical sciences, translating them directly into the design arts remains a challenge due to the need to simultaneously consider aesthetic, functional and technological aspects. This results in an inadequate understanding and arrangement of these terms in the field of architecture. This article is an attempt to precisely define and differentiate the concepts used in ‘bio’ architecture, with a view to identifying particular streams in biology-inspired design. The first part of the article analyses the definitions found in the literature and puts them in order. The second part presents an analysis of four designs drawing from different biological disciplines such as neuroscience, mycology, biochemistry and botany.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Achramowicz R., Kuhnert E., Biology as a Source of Inspiration for Architectural Innovations, w: Defining the Architectural Space – Architecture and Technology, t. 3, red. T. Kozłowski, Kraków 2024.
 
2.
Addington D.M., Schodek D., Smart Materials and Technologies for the Architecture and Design Professions, London 2004 Agkathidis A., Biomorphic Structures: Architecture Inspired by Nature, London 2017.
 
3.
Ascott R., Th e Architecture of Cyberception, „Architectural Design”, 1995, nr 65/11–12.
 
4.
Baldwin I., Schultz J., Rapid Changes in Tree Leaf Chemistry Induced by Damage: Evidence for Communication Between Plants, „Science”, 1983, nr 221.
 
5.
Benyus J.M., Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, New York 1997.
 
6.
Białkiewicz J.J., Biomimetyka i biomimikra jako narzędzie i ideologia we współczesnej architekturze, „Architectus”, 2024, nr 3, DOI: 10.37190/arc240310.
 
7.
Campany D., Man Ray and Marcel Duchamp: Dust Breeding 1920, https://davidcampany.com/ dust-breeding-man-ray-1920/.
 
8.
Castanheiro A., Leaf Accumulation of Atmospheric Dust: Biomagnetic, Morphological and Elemental Evaluation Using SEM, ED-XRF and HR-ICP-MS, „Atmospheric Environment”, 2020, nr 221, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117082.
 
9.
Clegg B., Biomimetics: How Lessons from Nature can Transform Technology, London 2023 Encyklopedia Britannica, edycja polska, t. 4, red. W. Wolarski, Poznań 1998.
 
10.
Eze V.C., Agblevor M., Oyedun A., Biochemical Conversion of Algal Biomass into Biofuels, „Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining”, 2018, nr 12/5.
 
11.
Fromm E., Love of Death and Love of Life. The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil, New York, 1964.
 
12.
Gennaro S., Kellner D., Digital Culture, Media, and the Challenges of Contemporary Cyborg Youth, Bioinformational Philosophy and Postdigital Knowledge Ecologies, red. M.A. Peters, P. Jandrić, S. Hayes, Cham 2022.
 
13.
Grigson G., The Arts Today, London 1935 Haddon A.C., Evolution in Art, London 1895.
 
14.
Haraway D.J., A Manifesto of Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s, „Socialist Review”, 1985, t. 15.
 
15.
Hensel M., Performance-Oriented Architecture: Rethinking Architectural Design and the Built Environment, Chichester 2013.
 
16.
Iouguina A., Dawson J.W., Hallgrimsson B., Smart G., Biologically Informed Disciplines: A Comparative Analysis of Bionics, Biomimetics, Biomimicry, and Bio-Inspiration Among Others, „International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics”, 2014, t. 9/3, DOI: 10.2495/DNE-V9-N3-201-206.
 
17.
Kapsali W., Biomimetics for Designers. Applying Nature’s Processes & Material in the Real World, London 2021.
 
18.
Kellert S.R., Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, Hoboken 2008.
 
19.
Margulis L., Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution, New York 1998 Mang P., Reed B., Designing from Place: A Regenerative Framework and Methodology, „Building Research & Information”, 2011, nr 40/1, DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2012.621341.
 
20.
Mitchell W.J., Me++: Th e Cyborg Self and the Networked City, Cambridge (MA) 2003.
 
21.
Nowak A., Kształtowanie bionicznych powierzchni strukturalnych w architekturze współczesnych elewacji, rozprawa doktorska wykonana pod kierunkiem prof. Wiesława Rokickiego na Wydziale Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej (WAPW), Warszawa 2017, mps dostępny w Bibliotece WAPW.
 
22.
Onyszkiewicz J., Elementy biomimetyki w projektowaniu architektury w środowisku zrównoważonym, rozprawa doktorska wykonana pod kierunkiem dr. hab. inż. Waldemara Bobera na Wydziale Architektury Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław 2019, Dolnośląska Biblioteka Cyfrowa, https://dbc. wroc.pl/dlibra/publication/140767/edition/72670.
 
23.
Oosterhuis K., Hyperbodies: Towards an E-motive Architecture, Basel 2003.
 
24.
Oosterhuis K., Saltwater Pavilion, 1997, https://worldarchitecture.org/....
 
25.
Pasquero C., Poletto M., Greskova T., Photosynthetic Architecture in Times of Climate Change and Other Global Disruptions, w: Anthropologic – Architecture and Fabrication in the Cognitive Age: Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe Conference, 2020, t. 1.
 
26.
Priestley J., Experiments and Observations on Diff erent Kinds of Air, Cambridge 2013.
 
27.
Roche F., Dusty Relief, „New-Territories”, 2002, https://www.new-territories.co....
 
28.
Sachs A., Nature Design. From Inspiration to Innovation, Baden 2007.
 
29.
Söderlund J., Newman P., Biophilic Architecture: A Review of the Rationale and Outcomes, „AIMS Environmental Science”, 2015, nr 2/4, DOI: 10.3934/environsci.2015.4.950.
 
30.
Spiller N., Leaving Nadir, „Architectural Design”, 1996, nr 66/9–10.
 
31.
Tatarkiewicz W., Mimesis, w: Dictionary of the History of Ideas, red. P.G. Wiener, t. 3, New York 1973.
 
32.
Thompson D.W., On Growth and Form, Cambridge 1917.
 
33.
Torberntsson A., Michalak H., O kształtowaniu konstrukcji budowlanych z wykorzystaniem wzorców ze świata przyrody, „Przegląd Budowlany”, 2023, nr 94/5–6.
 
34.
Voda I.I., Fluidity and Entropy in Contemporary Architecture: Chaos Between Space-Time and MatterEnergy, w: With(Out) Trace: Inter-Disciplinary Investigations into Time, Space and the Body, Leiden 2015, DOI: 10.1163/9781848884410_022.
 
35.
Wilson E., Biophilia, Cambridge (MA) 1984.
 
eISSN:2657-6864
ISSN:0023-5865
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top