The Use of Stakeholder Analysis for the Preparation and Implementation of an Industrial Investment Project: the Case of a Waste Processing Plant
1
Katedra Projektowania Architektonicznego, Wydział Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej, Polska
Submission date: 2025-07-12
Final revision date: 2025-08-25
Acceptance date: 2025-08-28
Publication date: 2026-03-17
Corresponding author
Andrzej Wiktor Olejniczak
Katedra Projektowania Architektonicznego, Wydział Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej, Koszykowa 55, Warszawa, Polska
Katedra Projektowania Architektonicznego, Wydział Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej, Koszykowa 55, Warszawa, Polska
KAiU 2025;LXX(2):58-89
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This article presents the application of stakeholder analysis in the preparation and implementation
of an industrial investment project, using a waste treatment plant as an example. The author focuses on identifying the key risks arising from the relationships between stakeholders in the investment process. The study used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods: calculations were made in IPYNB files. The method used allows for earlier detection of sensitive dependencies and better design decisions. Stakeholder analysis can be a useful tool in an architect’s practice, especially in projects that require coordination of multiple parties and compliance with complex formal requirements. The author proposes to extend the method to model interactions using the game theory.
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2010/75/UE z dnia 24 listopada 2010 r. w sprawie emisji przemysłowych (zintegrowane zapobieganie zanieczyszczeniom i ich kontrola), Dz.Urz. UE L 334 z 17.12.2010.
2.
Rozporządzenie Ministra Rozwoju z dnia 29 stycznia 2016 r. w sprawie rodzajów i ilości znajdujących się w zakładzie substancji niebezpiecznych, decydujących o zaliczeniu zakładu do zakładu o zwiększonym lub dużym ryzyku wystąpienia poważnej awarii przemysłowej, Dz.U. 2016, poz. 138.
3.
Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 10 września 2019 r. w sprawie przedsięwzięć mogących znacząco oddziaływać na środowisko, Dz.U. 2019, poz. 1839.
4.
Ustawa z dnia 27 marca 2003 r. o planowaniu i zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym, Dz.U. 2003 Nr 80, poz. 717.
5.
Ustawa z dnia 3 października 2008 r. o udostępnianiu informacji o środowisku i jego ochronie, udziale społeczeństwa w ochronie środowiska oraz o ocenach oddziaływania na środowisko, Dz.U. 2008 Nr 199, poz. 1227.
6.
Ustawa z dnia 27 kwietnia 2001 r. – Prawo ochrony środowiska, Dz.U. 2025, poz. 647.
7.
Eden C., Ackermann F., Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management, London 1998.
8.
Eskerod P., Jepsen A. L., Project Stakeholder Management, Farnham-Burlington 2013.
10.
Griffiths C., Industrialize: The Insider’s Guide to Industrial Real Estate, [b.m.] 2023.
11.
Silverwood O.R., Industrial Real Estate Investing and Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Buying, Leasing, and Selling Industrial Buildings, Winchester 2024.
12.
Peca S.P., Real Estate Development a nd Investment: A Comprehensive Approach, Hoboken 2009.
13.
Polanyi M., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critic al Philosophy, London 2012.
14.
Schelling T.C., The Strategy of Conflict: With a New Preface, Cambridge, MA 1980.
15.
Bekius F., Meijer S., Selecting the Right Game Concept for Social Simulation of Real-World Systems, w: Advances in Social Simulation, red. H. Verhagen, M. Borit, G. Bravo, N. Wijermans, seria „Springer Proceedings in Complexity”, Cham 2020, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_7.
16.
Construction Stakeholder Management, red. E. Chinyio, P.O. Olomolaiye, Chichester-Ames 2010.
17.
Gładkowska-Chocian B., Determinanty podejmowania decyzji inwestycyjnych przy budowie zakładu produkcyjnego, w: Współczesne problemy ekonomiczne w badaniach młodych naukowców. T. 2: Zarządzanie organizacją, finanse i inwestycje, red. E. Gruszewska, E. Kuzionko-Ochrymiuk, A. Matel, Białystok 2018.
18.
Sławik A., Klasyfi kacja interesariuszy organizacji jako podstawa oceny ich oddziaływania, w: Perspektywa interesariuszy we współczesnych problemach zarządzania, red. A. Sławik, Kraków 2024.
19.
Bekius F., De Bruijn H., Meijer S., Collaboration patterns in the Dutch railway sector: Using game concepts to compare different outcomes in a unique development case, „Research in Transportation Economics”, 2018, t. 69, DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.011.
20.
Bekius F., Gomes S.L., A framework to design game theory-based interventions for strategic analysis of real-world problems with stakeholders, „European Journal of Operational Research”, 2023, t. 309, nr 2, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.046.
21.
Bendtsen E.B., Clausen L.P.W., Hansen S.F., A review of the state-of-the-art for stakeholder analysis with regard to environmental management and regulation, „Journal of Environmental Management”, 2021, t. 279, art. 111773, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111773.
22.
Desai V.M., Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement: An Integration between Theories of Organizational Legitimacy and Learning, „Academy of Management Journal”, 2018, t. 61, nr 1, DOI: 10.5465/amj.2016.0315.
23.
McKinney W., Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, “Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2010)”, Austin 2010, DOI: 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a.
24.
Hagberg A.A., Schult D. A., Swart P. J., Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX, “Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008)”, Pasadena 2008, DOI: 10.25080/TCWV9851.
25.
Jayasooriya V.M., Ng A.W.M., Muthukumaran S., Perera C.B.J., Optimization of Green Infrastructure Practices in Industrial Areas for Runoff Management: A Review on Issues, Challenges and Opportunities, „Water”, 2020, t. 12, nr 4, art. 1024, DOI: 10.3390/w12041024.
26.
Juchniewicz M., Dojrzałość organizacji w angażowaniu interesariuszy projektu w procesy zmian / Stakeholder management maturity – change process perspective, „Management Forum”, 2017, nr 1, DOI: 10.15611/mf.2017.1.02.
27.
Khan A., Thaheem M.J., Khan M.N., Nasir A.R., Maqsoom A., Improving the Performance of Public Sector Infrastructure Projects: Role of Project Governance and Stakeholder Management, „Journal of Management in Engineering”, 2021, t. 37, nr 2, art. 04020112, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) ME.1943-5479.0000886.
28.
Kujala J., Sachs S., Leinonen H., Heikkinen A., Laude D., Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future, „Business & Society”, 2022, t. 61, nr 5, DOI: 10.1177/00076503211066595.
29.
Kusuma A.P.W., Ekasiwi S.N.N., Arifianto D., Application of Acoustic Material for Facade to Reduce Noise Impact in Building Located Near from Rail, „Journal of Architecture & Environment”, 2015, t. 14, nr 1.
30.
Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J., Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, „The Academy of Management Review”, 1997, t. 22, nr 4, DOI: 10.2307/259247.
31.
Ni G., Liu Y., Yang Y., Wu J., Transformation paths and influencing factors of tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge in real estate companies: a qualitative study, „Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management”, 2022, t. 29, nr 3, DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0677.
32.
Olander S., Landin A., Evaluation of Stakeholder Influence in the Implementation of Construction Projects, „International Journal of Project Management”, 2005, t. 23, nr 4, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002.
33.
Passetti E., Bianchi L., Battaglia M., Frey M., When Democratic Principles are not Enough: Tensions and Temporalities of Dialogic Stakeholder Engagement, „Journal of Business Ethics”, 2019, t. 155, nr 1, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3500-z.
34.
Patterson D.A., Yang J.B., El Asmar M., Chang S., Comparing Cost, Schedule, and Quality of CM/GC and DBB Project Delivery for Repetitive Commercial Construction, „International Journal of Construction Education and Research”, 2023, t. 19, nr 2, DOI: 10.1080/15578771.2021.2013998.
35.
Yang R.J., An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives, „International Journal of Project Management”, 2014, t. 32, nr 5, DOI: 10.1016/j. ijproman.2013.10.011.
36.
Zhu Q., Zhao Y., Mao X., Chang R., Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis of Off-Site Construction Projects: Utilizing a Power-Interest Matrix and the Fuzzy Logic Theory, „Buildings”, 2024, t. 14, nr 9, art. 2865, DOI: 10.3390/buildings14092865.
| eISSN: | 2657-6864 |
| ISSN: | 0023-5865 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
